- too-skinny
- Megan Fox amp; Brian Austin Green
- Megan Fox Too Skinny?
- Megan Fox loves sushi.
- Megan Fox Looks Too Skinny
- Megan Fox Too Skinny?
- that Megan Fox wanted too
- Megan Fox is pure eyecandy.
- tattoo images Megan Fox: Too
- Megan Fox in Hervé Léger for
- megan fox vinegar diet megan
- megan fox too skinny,
images Megan Fox is pure eyecandy. 
wallpaper too-skinny
2011 Megan Fox amp; Brian Austin Green
more...
more...
2010 Megan Fox Too Skinny?
more...
hair Megan Fox loves sushi.
more...
hot Megan Fox Looks Too Skinny
baburob2
09-08 07:38 PM
that shouldn't be any issue. She would be admitted at POE. However if she has filed for H4 extension and if the H4 extension is pending when she enters into US, the H4 extension will be considered abandonded and will be asked to go to consulate for stamping before her I-94 expires and can't use the approved H4 extension's I-94. check with yuour attorney on it.
wallpaper too-skinny
ttdam
10-22 03:38 PM
I got the receipt #s from back of the checks.
EAD & AP pending with VSC, 485 transferred back to TSC
EAD & AP pending with VSC, 485 transferred back to TSC
Blog Feeds
08-12 09:50 AM
There is not a dull moment this summer for us immigration lawyers, all thanks to good old USCIS. On 8/6/09 USCIS announced that it has reopened the fiscal year 2009 H-2B petition filing period and will immediately accept petitions. This is after closing the cap in January this year.
How could this happen? The Department of State received far fewer than expected requests for H-2B visas and as a result, has issued only 40,640 H-2B visas for fiscal year 2009 to date. This means that there are approximately 25,000 visas that may go unused, as they have not been granted. Because of the low visa issuance rate, USCIS is reopening the filing period to allow employers to file additional petitions for qualified H-2B temporary foreign nonagricultural workers.
But the catch is that filing and processing must be done by September 30, 2009. So those eligible must use the premium processing to do so. Also, employers must submit the Form I-129 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker to USCIS with all required documents, including an approved Alien Employment Certification from the U.S. Department of Labor that is valid for the entire employment period stated on the petition. The petitioner must also indicate an employment start date before Oct. 1, 2009. Otherwise the case will be considered for fiscal year 2010.
These are good news for employers in the Hospitality and construction industries, as long as they have approved Labor Certification to be used. My guess is that there are not too many employers that filed for Labor Certifications knowing that visas will not last too long. But this is an indication for the future of the H2B visa and the cap restrictions. We call the government to lift the cap once and for all.
Read the press release from USCIS here Download file (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/uscis%202009.pdf)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/08/h2b_visas_uscis_announces_reop.html)
How could this happen? The Department of State received far fewer than expected requests for H-2B visas and as a result, has issued only 40,640 H-2B visas for fiscal year 2009 to date. This means that there are approximately 25,000 visas that may go unused, as they have not been granted. Because of the low visa issuance rate, USCIS is reopening the filing period to allow employers to file additional petitions for qualified H-2B temporary foreign nonagricultural workers.
But the catch is that filing and processing must be done by September 30, 2009. So those eligible must use the premium processing to do so. Also, employers must submit the Form I-129 Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker to USCIS with all required documents, including an approved Alien Employment Certification from the U.S. Department of Labor that is valid for the entire employment period stated on the petition. The petitioner must also indicate an employment start date before Oct. 1, 2009. Otherwise the case will be considered for fiscal year 2010.
These are good news for employers in the Hospitality and construction industries, as long as they have approved Labor Certification to be used. My guess is that there are not too many employers that filed for Labor Certifications knowing that visas will not last too long. But this is an indication for the future of the H2B visa and the cap restrictions. We call the government to lift the cap once and for all.
Read the press release from USCIS here Download file (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/uscis%202009.pdf)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/08/h2b_visas_uscis_announces_reop.html)
2011 Megan Fox amp; Brian Austin Green
ajp5
08-05 04:50 PM
There is just one thing you can do......pray........however gods immigration dept is as slow as USCIS............IV community will attest to that:)
Ofcourse you dont need approved h1b to leave the country......only to come back..so if you will be there for a few weeks you can get PP done till then........make sure stamping etc is taken care of before you show up at POE.........
Ofcourse you dont need approved h1b to leave the country......only to come back..so if you will be there for a few weeks you can get PP done till then........make sure stamping etc is taken care of before you show up at POE.........
more...
El Hacko
June 12th, 2006, 10:20 PM
I agree with Jliechty...Colorful photo Antoine but less bokeh and focus for all the berries in this one make it a winner. Got to say, the lighting and colors look great!
seemashah
02-21 04:26 PM
Hi:
I was working for Company A from 2000 to 2004. Company A applied for my GC in 2002. However, the company was not doing well until I left it. It was not paying me the salary which came out in PW. Company A continued with my GC processing and I filed for I140 and 485 last year in June. Now received the following RFE for I140:
Please submit documentary evidence that you, the petitioning employer, have the financial
ability to pay the wage/salary you offered the beneficiary. This evidence must show that you
have this financial capability on the date you fied the ETA with the Department of Labor and
cover up until the visa is issued. The petitioner may submit evidence that their net income is
equal to or greater than the proffered wage, evidence that the petitioner's net current assets
are equal to or greater than the proffered wage, or evidence that the petitioner not only is
employing the beneficiary but also has paid or is currently paying the proffered wage. The
service wil also consider copies of audited annual reports of the employer, or copies of
audited financial statements of the employer. Evidence is needed for 2002-2003.
Does anyone have some idea how to get the audited financial statements or audited annual reports?. I know that the company never had any audited reports. I had submitted the bank statements of the company and the tax returns with my I140. However, it seems that they want the audited reports. The company was not doing well in 2002/2003. However, it is doing well now. So any input will be highly appreciated.
I was working for Company A from 2000 to 2004. Company A applied for my GC in 2002. However, the company was not doing well until I left it. It was not paying me the salary which came out in PW. Company A continued with my GC processing and I filed for I140 and 485 last year in June. Now received the following RFE for I140:
Please submit documentary evidence that you, the petitioning employer, have the financial
ability to pay the wage/salary you offered the beneficiary. This evidence must show that you
have this financial capability on the date you fied the ETA with the Department of Labor and
cover up until the visa is issued. The petitioner may submit evidence that their net income is
equal to or greater than the proffered wage, evidence that the petitioner's net current assets
are equal to or greater than the proffered wage, or evidence that the petitioner not only is
employing the beneficiary but also has paid or is currently paying the proffered wage. The
service wil also consider copies of audited annual reports of the employer, or copies of
audited financial statements of the employer. Evidence is needed for 2002-2003.
Does anyone have some idea how to get the audited financial statements or audited annual reports?. I know that the company never had any audited reports. I had submitted the bank statements of the company and the tax returns with my I140. However, it seems that they want the audited reports. The company was not doing well in 2002/2003. However, it is doing well now. So any input will be highly appreciated.
more...
radhay
04-16 08:28 AM
adithi123, I am planning on sending to the address on e-filing receipt (TSC).
Also, there is another thread open for e-filing EAD related topic so you can post your questions there. http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum70-self-filing-documents-forms-directions-mailing/18737-ead-e-filing-experiences-eb-44.html
Also, there is another thread open for e-filing EAD related topic so you can post your questions there. http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum70-self-filing-documents-forms-directions-mailing/18737-ead-e-filing-experiences-eb-44.html
2010 Megan Fox Too Skinny?
srini1976
07-09 01:21 PM
What is your PD & EB Category please?
more...
QuickGreenCard
04-29 07:33 PM
all the responses. Does anyone know how to get my mom's I-94 back?
hair Megan Fox loves sushi.
rameshraju11
06-05 04:08 PM
Hi,
My current Attorney could not inform my employer for H1B RFE. H1B RFE supposed to be submited by May 25th. however Attorney only informed today about the RFE. Employer needs a week to submit RFE. can we submit RFE after RFE submission date ?
Thanks
My current Attorney could not inform my employer for H1B RFE. H1B RFE supposed to be submited by May 25th. however Attorney only informed today about the RFE. Employer needs a week to submit RFE. can we submit RFE after RFE submission date ?
Thanks
more...
pappu
07-24 04:38 PM
Wait until 180 days. Check the archives for answer before starting new threads. Pls try to have a more descriptive title to threads.
hot Megan Fox Looks Too Skinny
Anders �stberg
February 18th, 2004, 12:08 AM
i'm no pro, but i think the first is much better then the second. the framing of the image is a bit off, but to me that's what makes the image.
There's no right or wrong really, just some de facto rules or guidelines - sometimes an image can be more interesting if those rules are broken. I guess it comes down to personal taste.
There's no right or wrong really, just some de facto rules or guidelines - sometimes an image can be more interesting if those rules are broken. I guess it comes down to personal taste.